Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance comparisons of cancer classification using different classifiers

From: Computer-aided analysis of radiological images for cancer diagnosis: performance analysis on benchmark datasets, challenges, and directions

Refs.

Cancer pathology

Methodology

Features

Database

Performance

El Nawar et al. (2019)

Lung cancer

AlexNet (MAN) MAN

Support Vector Machines Principal Component Analysis

X-ray images LIDC-IDRI

Accuracy (97.27%), sensitivity (98.09%) specificity (95.63%), precision (97.80%), F1 score (97.95%) AUC (0.995%)

Husham et al. (2016)

 

Wavelet Recurrent Neural Network

Not mentioned

Lung images

sensitivity 93.75%, specificity 66.67%, and accuracy 84% for training data and sensitivity 88.24%, specificity 75%, and accuracy 84% for testing data

Iftikhar et al. (2017a)

Breast cancer

4-qubit-quantum circuit with six-layered architecture

Deep features

histopathological dataset

99%

Yurttakal et al. (2020)

 

Multi-layer CNN

Not mentioned

MRI

98.33% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, 96.9% specificity, 96.55% precision, and 0.0167 loss

Sharif et al. (2019)

 

Fusion (RCNN and CNN)

Not mentioned

ICPR 2012, ICPR 2014 [MITOS-ATYPIA-14] histopathology images

87.6% precision, 84.1% recall and 85.8% F1-measure on ICPR 2012 database, and 84.8% precision, 58.3 recall and 69.1% F1-on ICPR 2014 database

Escorcia-Gutierrez et al. (2022)

Skin cancer

Ensemble learning and deep learning

Thermal parameters from thermograms of lesions

Infrared thermal imaging

96.65% precision, 94.11% recall, 95.36% f1-score, 91.85% ROC (AUC)

Khan et al. (2019)

 

Neural network (NN) [DSL-1]

Not mentioned

Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)

62% sensitivity and 83% specificity

Andreeva et al. (2021)

Brain tumour

Support vector machine

Discrete cosine transform-based

MRI and SPECT images

96.8% accuracy, 95% precision, 94% recall, 93% specificity, 91% F1 score

Diab et al. (2020)

 

Bat Algorithm with Fuzzy C-Ordered Means (BAFCOM) Enhanced Capsule Networks (ECN)

Region of Interest (RoI)

MRI

95.81% accuracy, 94.83% precision, 94.34% recall and 94.85% F1-score

Al-Koussa et al. (2020)

 

SVM, KNN, DT classifiers fusion

Adaptive histogram equalization

MRI & SPECT

Accuracy 96.8%, precision 95%, recall 94%, specificity 93%, F1 91%

Saba et al. (2012)

 

3D CNN

Deep features extraction

BRATS MRI

98.32% highest accuracy