Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlations between factors and Hausdorff distance in gross tumor volume

From: Efficacy and safety of FDG-PET for determining target volume during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer involving the oral level

 

PET

CT

MRI

No

HD (median ± SD)/ correlation coefficient (ρ)

p-value

No

HD (median ± SD)/ correlation coefficient (ρ)

p-value

No

HD (median ± SD)/ correlation coefficient (ρ)

p-value

Primary site

Oropharyngeal cancer

4

0

1

4

1.24 ± 0.64

0.77

3

1.89 ± 1.20

0.36

Other

4

0

 

4

1.24 ± 0.40

 

5

0.73 ± 0.11

 

Stage

De novo

5

0

1

5

1.22 ± 0.55

0.65

5

0.73 ± 0.12

0.36

Recurrent

3

0

 

3

1.26 ± 0.48

 

3

1.88 ± 1.20

 

Dental artifacts and GTV on the same axial plane

Yes

4

0

1

4

1.17 ± 0.43

1

4

1.61 ± 1.10

0.3

No

4

0

 

4

1.30 ± 0.60

 

4

0.71 ± 0.13

 

Size of GTV

    

ρ = 0.52

0.18

 

ρ = 0.96

0.0001

Distance between dental artifacts and GTV

    

ρ = −0.26

0.53

 

ρ =  −0.31

0.44

  1. PET = positron emission tomography, CT = computed tomography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, HD = Hausdorff distance, GTV = gross tumor volume, SD = standard deviation