Low dose radiation 18F–fluoride PET/CT in the assessment of Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia of the mandible: preliminary results of a single centre experience
© The Author(s) 2018
Received: 12 November 2017
Accepted: 15 January 2018
Published: 9 April 2018
Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) of the mandible, or Hypercondylia, is a pathological condition that determines an abnormal growth of the affected condyle.
Bone SPECT with Tc99m-diphosphonates is a successful tool in the diagnosis of UCH. EANM guidelines also suggest the use of 18F–NaF PET/CT, though it leads to a higher radiation exposure.
As UCH patients are young, we aimed to develop a low dose 18F–Fluoride PET/CT protocol and compare it to a standard injected activity scan, to assess if the image quality remains unchanged.
Materials and methods
We prospectively enrolled 20 patients (7 males, 13 females, mean age 23.2) with UCH, who underwent 18F–NaF PET/CT to assess the hypercondylia. We administered a low activity of 18F–NaF (2.9 MBq/kg) in 15 patients and a standard activity (5.3 MBq/kg) in 5 patients. Activity range was chosen according to 2015 EANM guidelines.
To determine if the scans with low radiotracer activity were “diagnostic” such as those with standard activity, two expert nuclear medicine physicians, unaware of the administered activity, independently reviewed the scans and expressed a final qualitative judgment in terms of “diagnostic”/“non-diagnostic” scan. Furthermore, we compared the effective dose of a low injected activity PET/CT to the standard one and to a Bone SPECT performed with standard injected activity of Tc99m-diphosphonates.
Reviewers classified 19 of 20 scans as “diagnostic”. Only one of them was classified as “non diagnostic” due to condylar arthrosis that disturbed the correct evaluation of condylar radiotracer uptake. The effective dose of a 18F–Fluoride PET/CT, in patient of 70 kg, is about 3.5 mSv in scans performed with 2.9 MBq/kg [0.017 mSv/MBq × 2.9 MBq/kg × 70 kg] and about 6.3 mSv in ones performed with 5.3 MBq/kg [0.017 mSv/MBq × 5.3 MBq/kg × 70 kg]. The effective dose of 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT is about 3.2 mSv [0.0043 mSv/MBq × 740 MBq of 99mTc-MDP].
18F–NaF PET/CT performed with a low radiotracer activity allows a good assessment of UCH similar to that performed with an ordinary activity. The effective radiation dose of a low-injected activity PET/CT is significantly lower than an ordinary-injected activity and is not significantly higher than the most used Bone SPECT. Moreover PET/CT is performed in 1.5 h while Bone SPECT requires at least 3.5 h.
The 18F–Fluoride PET/CT procedure could be performed with 2.9 MBq/Kg (minimum 185 MBq, recommended at least 200 MBq) of 18F–NaF to minimize the effective radiation dose received, maintaining the quality of the scan. Further studies including a larger number of patients and clinical follow-up are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.
Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) of the mandible, or Hypercondylia, is a rare pathological condition, in which an abnormal growth of the condyle causes facial asymmetry (Cervelli et al., 2008; Ahmed et al., 2016). It affects young people at pre-puberty or puberty (both sexes may be affected but prevalence is higher in females) (Raijmakers et al., 2012).
Obwegeser and Makek, in 1986, distinguished three different facial malformations due to condylar hyperplasia: hemimandibular hyperplasia (HH), hemimandibular elongation (HE) and a mixed form (Obwegeser & Makek, 1986).
HH is characterized by a unilateral three-dimensional enlargement of mandible (in both horizontal and vertical dimensions) with shifting of the midpoint of the chin to the unaffected side (Mohan et al., 2013).
HE is characterized by a unilateral horizontal elongation of mandible and the rotation of the chin is not so prominent (Mohan et al., 2013).
UCH, less frequent, may cause also functional alterations of the temporo-mandibular joint such as obstruction in mouth opening (sometimes associated with wobbling of the occlusion plane), third class occlusion, contralateral crossed bite, pain (especially during the palpation) and joint noise (Cervelli et al., 2008; Ferreira et al., 2014).
Pathogenesis of UCH is unclear (Olate et al., 2013). However, it seems that many factors could induce a unilateral abnormal growth: circulatory default, traumas, hormonal dysfunctions, cartilage exostosis, infections and arthrosis (Cervelli et al., 2008; Gn et al., 2015; Wolford et al., 2002).
From the functional point of view, many authors distinguish UCH in two forms: active hypercondylia (if the mandibular condyle is still in active growth) and inactive hypercondylia (if the growth is completed) (Pripatnanont et al., 2005). These different forms may require different treatments. In fact, many authors agree that an inactive UCH should be treated with a Le Fort I osteotomy while an active UCH should be treated with a Le Fort I osteotomy + condylectomy (Ferreira et al., 2014; Olate et al., 2013; Marchetti et al., 2000).
The diagnostic process of UCH includes a clinical approach, supported by imaging, both anatomical and functional.
In order to confirm the clinical suspicion, patients with facial asymmetry usually perform a radiographic examination. However, to date, three-dimensional imaging procedures are preferred: the dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) seems to be the best radiological three-dimensional procedure to evaluate the morphological condition of the condyle (Nolte et al., 2016).
After that, a functional nuclear medicine imaging procedure is required to distinguish between active UCH (affected mandibular condyle still in a phase of active growth) and inactive UCH (no signs of active growth in affected mandibular condyle).
This distinction between active/inactive hypercondylia is critical for choosing the appropriate surgical treatment (Pripatnanont et al., 2005). Many studies in literature indicate Bone SPECT (99mTc-diphosphonates, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) as a successful technique to distinguish between active and inactive growth. Because the diphosphonates uptake depends on the osteoblastic activity, active centres of ossification are detected as areas of increased uptake of the radiotracer (Wen et al., 2014; Saridin et al., 2011).
The 2015 EANM guidelines suggest also the use of 18F–NaF PET-CT (18F–Fluoride PET/CT), in the assessment of UCH (Beheshti et al., 2015): in fact, incorporation of 18F–fluoride ions into the bone matrix is higher in sites of new mineralization such as during bone growth. Compared to Bone SPECT, 18F–NaF PET-CT provides better spatial resolution images; furthermore, the protein bound fraction of 18F–NaF is lower than the 99mTc-MDP and the clearance from the blood is faster, resulting in lower background radiotracer signal (Laverick et al., 2009). Drawbacks of Fluoride PET/CT include the dose delivered to the patient. According to EANM guidelines, 5.3 MBq/Kg of 18F–NaF (on average) should be administered, providing a dose higher than bone SPECT.
The aim of this study was to develop a low dose 18F–NaF PET/CT protocol and compare it to a standard injected activity scan, to assess if the image quality remains unchanged.
In standard 18F–NaF PET/CT protocol the injected activity is about 5.3 MBq/Kg of 18F–NaF.
In our optimized protocol we decided to inject the lowest activity allowed by 2015 EANM guidelines that is 2.9 MBq/Kg of 18F–NaF (minimum 185 MBq).
From May 2015 to July 2017, we prospectively enrolled 20 patients (7 males, 13 females, mean age 23.2, range 15–43 years) with noticeable facial-mandibular asymmetry strongly suspicious for UCH. All patients were clinically examined by two maxillo-facial surgeons experts in UCH; the initial situation was accurately documented with iconographic material and stored in to the patient clinical history.
Before the examination, women in childbearing age signed an informed consent to exclude pregnancy. Patients were asked to drink water (at least 50 cl) after radiotracer injection. No other cares were required. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A (5 patients) were injected with the standard activity of 5.3 MBq/Kg of 18F–NaF while patients of group B (15 patients) were injected with the lowest activity allowed by 2015 EANM guidelines (Beheshti et al., 2015) that is 2.9 MBq/Kg of 18F–NaF (minimum 185 MBq).
All patients underwent the PET/CT scan 1 h after injection of 18F–NaF using a Discovery 710 TF PET/CT system (GE Medical System, Waukesha, WI).
The second step was a single-bed 10 min Time of flight PET scan, performed from the glabella to the chin. PET images were reconstructed using a View Point HD iterative reconstruction algorithm using both time of flight and point spread function recovery resolution information.
Where SUVmax-ac is the SUV max of the affected condyle and SUVmax-nac is the SUV max of the non-affected condyle.
If the higher radiotracer uptake is on cortical bone this could be due to arthrosis. In this case, SUV measurement and UCH assessment are not optimal.
Based on literature (Ahmed et al., 2016), a SUVmax percentage difference > 10% was considered suspected for an abnormal unilateral active condylar growth and patients were considered for a mandibular condylectomy of the hotter side (in addition to the Le Fort I). However, a SUVmax percentage difference between 10 and 15% was classified as “grey zone”.
The CT images of the PET/CT scan were used for a precise surgery planning.
Patients with a SUVmax percentage difference < 10% were classified as suspected for inactive UCH and candidates to a conservative treatment of the condyle (only Le Fort I osteotomy).
To determine if the PET/CT scans performed with a low dose of radiotracer (group B) were effectively “diagnostic” such as those performed with a standard dose of radiotracer (group A), we asked to two expert nuclear medicine physicians (CN, PLG), unaware of the administered activity, to review the scans and express a final qualitative judgment in terms of “diagnostic or non-diagnostic scan”.
In terms of effective dose, data were derived from ICRP recommendations (ICRP 128): in particular effective dose from 99mTc- diphosphonates is 0.0043 mSv/MBq, while effective dose for 18-F Fluoride is 0.017 mSv/MBq (Mattsson et al., 2015). CT doses were derived from dose reports stored on the system for each acquisition. We compared the effective dose of a PET/CT performed with a low injected activity to a PET/CT performed with a standard injected activity and to a Bone SPECT performed with a standard injected activity of 99mTc-diphosphonates (bone SPECT, to date, is the most used nuclear medicine imaging procedure in UCH assessment).
Nineteen out of 20 examinations were classified as “diagnostic” by reviewers. Only one of them was classified as “non diagnostic” because of an augmented uptake area in the bone cortical medial side of the non-affected condyle, probably due to arthrosis, that disturbed the correct process of SUVmax measurement in this patient.
Low dose PET/CT scans resulted of good quality as well as ordinary dose scans.
Low dose scans performed with at least 200 MBq of 18F–NaF resulted in a better examination quality compared to ones performed with less than 200 MBq.
18-F Fluoride PET/CT UCH patient results
Injected activity (MBq)
UCH patient affected side (R=right, L=left)
Increased uptake side (R=right, L=left)
SUVmax % difference
Fifteen out of 19 patients showed a higher radiotracer uptake on the affected condyle suspected of active hypercondylia: 7 of them presented percentage difference > 10% and classified as suspected for active disease, while the other 8 patients presented a percentage difference < 10% and classified as suspected for inactive disease.
The median percentage difference of the group of patients suspected for active disease was 18 ± 12.2%, while it was 2.85 ± 3.42% for patient suspected for inactive disease.
Only 4 of 19 showed a lower uptake on the condyle suspected of UCH in comparison to the normal one. However, in all of these cases, the absolute value of the percentage difference was < 10% (respectively 1, 1.5, 4.3 and 5.6%).
Furthermore 2 of 19 patients underwent previously a Bone SPECT: 18F–NaF PET/CT and Bone SPECT showed, in both examinations, a significant increased radionuclide uptake on affected condyle. PET/CT and Bone SPECT were in agreement with each other and with the clinical suspicious.
Based on ICRP tabulated values the effective dose of a PET scan performed with 2.9 MBq/Kg of 18F–NaF (low administered activity) in a patient of 70 Kg, was about 3.5 mSv, while it was about 6.3 mSv for scan performed with 5.3 MBq/Kg (ordinary administered activity). The effective dose of a 99mTc-diphosphonates bone SPECT is 3.2 mSv in where a fixed value of 740 MBq of activity is injected. The effective dose to patients from CT scan was 0.15 mSv.
Fluoride PET/CT shows good performance in condylar activity evaluation and it offers a valid pre-surgical guide to maxillofacial surgeon.
The effective radiation dose of a low-dose PET/CT is significantly lower than a standard-dose PET/CT (3.5 mSv vs 6.3 mSv).
The effective radiation dose of a low-dose PET/CT is not significantly higher than the most used Bone SPECT (3.5 mSv vs 3.2 mSv). Moreover PET/CT is performed in 1.5 h while Bone SPECT requires at least 3.5 h.
PET/CT with 18F–NaF allows a good evaluation of the active or inactive state of growth of the mandibular condyle.
Based on our preliminary results, 18F–NaF PET/CT procedure could be performed, in UCH assessment, with 2.9 MBq/Kg of 18F–NaF (minimum 185 MBq, recommended 200 MBq) to minimize the effective radiation dose received by young patients without causing a significant deterioration of image quality.
The effective radiation dose of a low-dose PET/CT is not significantly higher than Bone SPECT and it ensures a better spatial resolution. However, the main concern of 18F–NaF PET/CT, if a cyclotron is not locally installed, is the cost of the radiotracer that is considerably higher than diphosphonates.
PET/CT could be performed in all of cases in which bone SPECT is not conclusive.
Further studies including a larger number of patients and clinical follow up are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.
Availability of data and materials
Not shared because of legal responsibility to respect participants’ rights to privacy and to protect their identity.
GML, SD, EC: patients selection, PET session organization, data analysis and article drafting. GC, SC: medical physics data processing. CP: medical physics data processing and article revision. CM, PLG, CN, SF: article revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Ahmed R, Singh SP, Mittal BR, Rattan V, Parghane R, Utreja A (2016) Role of fluorine-18 fluoride PET-CT scan in the assessment of unilateral condylar hyperplasia in faciomandibular asymmetry patients: a preliminary study. Nucl Med Commun 37(3):263–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000438 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beheshti M, Mottaghy FM, Payche F, Behrendt FF, Van den Wyngaert T, Fogelman I, Strobel K, Celli M, Fanti S, Giammarile F, Krause B, Langsteger W (2015) (18) F-NaF PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for bone imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(11):1767–1777. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3138-y Epub 2015 Jul 23View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cervelli V, Bottini DJ, Arpino A, Trimarco A, Cervelli G, Mugnaini F (2008) Hypercondylia: problems in diagnosis and therapeutic indications. J Craniofac Surg 19(2):406–410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318069019f View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira S, da Silva Fabris AL, Ferreira GR, Faverani LP, Francisconi GB, Souza FA, Garcia IR Jr (2014) Condylar hyperplasia: a treatment strategy. J Craniofac Surg. 25(3):e256–e258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000554 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gn S, Sharma ML, Jk DR, Goel S, Srivastava S (2015) Facial asymmetry in young adults with condylar hyperplasia-unusual changes in the facial bones. J Clin Diagn Res 9(1):ZD21–ZD23. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/10122.5483 Epub 2015 Jan1PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Laverick S, Bounds G, Wong WL (2009) [18F]-fluoride positron emission tomography for imaging condylar hyperplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(3):196–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.08.001 Epub 2008 Oct 15View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchetti C, Cocchi R, Gentile L, Bianchi A (2000) Hemimandibular hyperplasia: treatment strategies. J Craniofac Surg 11(1):46–53View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mattsson S, Johansson L, Leide Svegborn S, Liniecki J, Noßke D, Riklund KÅ, Stabin M, Taylor D, Bolch W, Carlsson S, Eckerman K, Giussani A, Söderberg L, Valind S (2015) ICRP; radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: a compendium of current information related to frequently used substances. Ann ICRP 44(2 Suppl):7–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645314558019 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohan RP, Verma S, Singh U, Agarwal N (2013) Hemimandibular hypertrophy - hybrid variants: report of two cases. J Clin Imaging Sci 3(Suppl 1):5. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.116199 eCollection 2013View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nolte JW, Verhoeven TJ, Schreurs R, Bergé SJ, Karssemakers LH, Becking AG, Maal TJ (2016) 3-dimensional CBCT analysis of mandibular asymmetry in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.09.016
- Obwegeser HL, Makek MS (1986) Hemimandibular hyperplasia--hemimandibular elongation. J Maxillofac Surg 14(4):183–208View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olate S, Netto HD, Rodriguez-Chessa J, Alister JP, de Albergaria-Barbosa J, de Moraes M (2013) Mandible condylar hyperplasia: a review of diagnosis and treatment protocol. Int J Clin Exp Med 6(9):727–737PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pripatnanont P, Vittayakittipong P, Markmanee U, Thongmak S, Yipintsoi T (2005) The use of SPECT to evaluate growth cessation of the mandible in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(4):364–368 Epub 2005 Jan 26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raijmakers PG, Karssemakers LH, Tuinzing DB (2012) Female predominance and effect of gender on unilateral condylar hyperplasia: a review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(1):e72–e76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.026 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saridin CP, Raijmakers PG, Tuinzing DB, Becking AG (2011) Bone scintigraphy as a diagnostic method in unilateral hyperactivity of the mandibular condyles: a review and meta-analysis of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40(1):11–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.015 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wen B, Shen Y, Wang CY (2014) Clinical value of 99Tcm-MDP SPECT bone Scintigraphy in the diagnosis of unilateral Condylar hyperplasia. Sci World J:256256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/256256 Published online 2014 May 11
- Wolford LM, Mehra P, Reiche-Fischel O, Morales-Ryan CA, García-Morales P (2002) Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 121(2):136–150 discussion 150-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar