Skip to main content

SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor detected by [18F]FDG PET/CT



SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor (SMARCA4-DTT) is a distinct entity of undifferentiated thoracic malignancies newly introduced in 2015. Due to its unique clinical characteristic with aggressive thoracic tumor mostly observed in heavy smoker man with emphysema, with poor prognosis, many physicians are becoming increasingly aware of the disease; however, reports on 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoroglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) have been limited; thus, this disease is not yet widely known to nuclear medicine clinicians. As a first step in discussing the usefulness of [18F]FDG PET/CT for this disease, we present a case in which [18F]FDG PET/CT played a clinically important role.


A 74-year-old heavy smoker man with an anamnesis of severe emphysema characterized by pleural thickening and abnormal enhancement in CT underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for further examination. [18F]FDG-avid pleural nodules infiltrating into the chest wall were detected and pathologically diagnosed as SMARCA4-DTT with biopsy.


SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor should be considered in a [18F]FDG-avid aggressive thoracic tumor in heavy smoker men with emphysema.


SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor (SMARCA4-DTT) is a distinct entity of undifferentiated thoracic malignancies newly introduced by Le Loarer et al. in 2015. SMARCA4-DTT is characterized by loss of SMARCA4, showing undifferentiated round cell or rhabdoid morphology presenting as aggressive behavior with compressive or infiltrative tumors mostly involving the mediastinum, lung, and/or pleura (Le Loarer et al. 2015; Crombé et al. 2019; Yoshida et al. 2017). Previous studies reported that it has male predominance (73.0–91.6%) and younger onset (median age 39–58, range 27–90 years), with a heavy smoking history (Le Loarer et al. 2015; Rekhtman et al. 2020; Perret et al. 2019; Yoshida et al. 2017). Because of its aggressive behavior and absence of effective therapies, it has a poor prognosis with reported median overall survival of 7 months (Le Loarer et al. 2015). Computed tomography (CT) usually shows relatively large tumor (mean size 9.2 [2.2–18.3] cm), showing an extensive involvement of thoracic structures, such as mediastinal, chest wall, and/or lung infiltration (Rekhtman et al. 2020; Crombé et al. 2019). Pulmonary emphysema/bullae are also common findings (Yoshida et al. 2017) due to the heavy smoking history, which could also be seen in other thoracic malignancies, such as lung cancer or malignant mesothelioma (Perret et al. 2019; Yoshida et al. 2017). Reports on its diagnosis using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoroglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) are limited; however, only a few studies reported it to show strong avidity to date (Rekhtman et al. 2020; Yoshida et al. 2017). Recently, the increasing number of reports with unique clinical characteristics made many physicians aware of the disease; however, due to the limited number of reports on [18F]FDG PET/CT, it is not yet widely known to nuclear medicine clinicians. Herein, we report an educational case of SMARCA4-DTT, showing high activity on [18F]FDG PET/CT that demonstrated chest wall infiltration, which was difficult to differentiate from other thoracic malignancies.

Case presentation

A 74-year-old heavy smoker man with an anamnesis of severe emphysema presented with a 2-week history of right chest pain. He was diagnosed with mild pleural thickening 6 months before presentation, and contrast-enhanced CT revealed worsening of pleural thickening and abnormal enhancement infiltrating into the right anterior chest wall (Fig. 1; a, b: yellow arrows) with severe emphysema (c), resulting in a suspected diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Fig. 1

SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor detected by [18F]FDG PET/CT. a Contrast-enhanced CT shows pleural thickening with abnormal enhancement. b Infiltration into the right anterior chest wall of the lesion (yellow arrow) can be observed. c Background emphysema is seen. d Maximum intensity projection of PET image shows multiple [18F]FDG-avid nodules in right thoracic areas. eg PET/CT fusion axial images showing multiple [18F]FDG-avid nodules located in the pleura infiltrating into the chest wall. h Hematoxylin–eosin stain of the tumor biopsy specimen shows dense proliferation of atypical epithelial-like cells. i SMARCA4 stain is negative in tumor cells leading to a diagnosis of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor

Further examination with [18F]FDG PET/CT was performed. Images were acquired on a PET/CT scanner developed by Toshiba Medical Systems (Aquiduo and Celesteion; Tochigi, Japan) at 60 min after injecting 211 MBq of [18F]FDG. It revealed a marked maximal standardized uptake value of 9.6 in the lesions, suggesting a highly aggressive tumor (d–g: yellow arrows). CT-guided biopsy was performed, and pathological findings showed dense proliferation of atypical epithelial-like cells that also infiltrated into the chest wall (h) with the loss of SMARCA4 (i), resulting in the diagnosis of SMARCA4-DTT. Chemotherapy was initiated but resulted only in a temporary response, and the patient’s condition worsened in several months.


SMARCA4-DTT is a new entity first introduced in 2015 (Le Loarer et al. 2015), with only few reports demonstrating the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for its diagnosis. Therefore, it was difficult to diagnose at the first visit. CT findings with pleural thickening and severe emphysema usually lead to the diagnosis of pleural plaque or malignant mesothelioma; however, in this case, [18F]FDG PET/CT played an important role in making us aware that the disease is a more aggressive tumor. In retrospect, chest wall infiltration and diffuse distribution of the tumor observed in [18F]FDG PET/CT appeared to be extremely fast for malignant mesothelioma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report showing that [18F]FDG PET/CT may be useful for differentiating SMARCA4-DTT from malignant mesothelioma.

In a largest case series of 21 cases that reported imaging findings for this disease, four patterns of [18F]FDG PET/CT were proposed: mediastinal, pleural, cervical, and retroperitoneal (Crombé et al. 2019). The present case was close to the pleural pattern, but was different from previous reports because it did not form one large mass. Thus, this case is new in that respect; however, it appeared to show typical clinical findings. Since SMARCA4-DTT is often misdiagnosed as a carcinoma of unknown primary origin or as an undifferentiated carcinoma (Yoshida et al. 2017), nuclear medicine clinicians should include this disease in their list of differential diagnoses. To date, the majority of SMARCA4-DTTs have been reported as SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas; however, there are increasing reports of carcinomas. Since the present case was an undifferentiated tumor that was pathologically difficult to clearly classify as sarcoma or carcinoma, we described it as SMARCA4-DTT.

No definitive treatment has been established; however, several reports showed the effectiveness of molecular targeted therapies such as nivolumab (Iijima et al. 2020; Naito et al. 2019) or pembrolizumab (Henon et al. 2019; Takada et al. 2019) with patients showing remission. [18F]FDG PET/CT is expected to play an important role in the early diagnosis of this disease and will contribute to the improvement of its prognosis. Furthermore, the value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in therapeutic assessment should be investigated and established as with other malignant tumors (Becker et al. 2020; Unterrainer et al. 2020).


We expect the present case helps nuclear medicine physicians to widely recognize this new disease and include SMARCA4-DTT as the differential diagnosis when encountering a [18F]FDG-avid aggressive thoracic tumor in heavy smoker men with emphysema. This report is also expected to establish strong evidence on the usefulness of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis and treatment evaluation of this new disease entity.

Availability of data and materials

The images and biopsy samples remain available in our database.



SMARCA4- deficient thoracic tumor




Positron emission tomography


Computed tomography


  1. Becker J, Schwarzenböck SM, Krause BJ (2020) FDG PET hybrid imaging. Recent Results Cancer Res 216:625–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crombé A, Alberti N, Villard N, Pilleul F, Buy X, Le Loarer F, Kind M (2019) Imaging features of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas: a multi-centric study of 21 patients. Eur Radiol 29(9):4730–4741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henon C, Blay JY, Massard C, Mir O, Bahleda R, Dumont S, Postel-Vinay S, Adam J, Soria JC, Le Cesne A (2019) Long lasting major response to pembrolizumab in a thoracic malignant rhabdoid-like SMARCA4-deficient tumor. Ann Oncol 30(8):1401–1403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iijima Y, Sakakibara R, Ishizuka M, Honda T, Shirai T, Okamoto T, Tateishi T, Sakashita H, Tamaoka M, Takemoto A, Kumaki Y, Ikeda S, Miyazaki Y (2020) Notable response to nivolumab during the treatment of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma: a case report. Immunotherapy 12(8):563–569.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Loarer F, Watson S, Pierron G, de Montpreville VT, Ballet S, Firmin N, Auguste A, Pissaloux D, Boyault S, Paindavoine S, Dechelotte PJ, Besse B, Vignaud JM, Brevet M, Fadel E, Richer W, Treilleux I, Masliah-Planchon J, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Zalcman G, Allory Y, Bourdeaut F, Thivolet-Bejui F, Ranchere-Vince D, Girard N, Lantuejoul S, Galateau-Sallé F, Coindre JM, Leary A, Delattre O, Blay JY, Tirode F (2015) SMARCA4 inactivation defines a group of undifferentiated thoracic malignancies transcriptionally related to BAF-deficient sarcomas. Nat Genet 47(10):1200–1205.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Naito T, Umemura S, Nakamura H, Zenke Y, Udagawa H, Kirita K, Matsumoto S, Yoh K, Niho S, Motoi N, Aokage K, Tsuboi M, Ishii G, Goto K (2019) Successful treatment with nivolumab for SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung carcinoma with a high tumor mutation burden: a case report. Thorac Cancer 10(5):1285–1288.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Perret R, Chalabreysse L, Watson S, Serre I, Garcia S, Forest F, Yvorel V, Pissaloux D, de Montpreville VT, Masliah-planchon J, Lantuejoul S, Brevet M, Blay J-Y, Coindre J-M, Tirode F, Le Loarer F (2019) SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas: clinicopathologic study of 30 cases with an emphasis on their nosology and differential diagnoses. Am J Surg Pathol 43:455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rekhtman N, Montecalvo J, Chang JC, Alex D, Ptashkin RN, Ai N, Sauter JL, Kezlarian B, Jungbluth A, Desmeules P, Beras A, Bishop JA, Plodkowski AJ, Gounder MM, Schoenfeld AJ, Namakydoust A, Li BT, Rudin CM, Riely GJ, Jones DR, Ladanyi M, Travis WD (2020) SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomatoid tumors represent primarily smoking-related undifferentiated carcinomas rather than primary thoracic sarcomas. J Thor Oncol 15(2):231–247.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takada K, Sugita S, Murase K, Kikuchi T, Oomori G, Ito R, Hayasaka N, Miyanishi K, Iyama S, Ikeda H, Kobune M, Emori M, Kato J, Hasegawa T (2019) Exceptionally rapid response to pembrolizumab in a SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma overexpressing PD-L1: a case report. Thorac Cancer 10(12):2312–2315.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Unterrainer M, Ruzicka M, Fabritius MP, Mittlmeier LM, Winkelmann M, Rübenthaler J, Brendel M, Subklewe M, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Ricke J, Kunz WG, Cyran CC (2020) PET/CT imaging for tumour response assessment to immunotherapy: current status and future directions. Eur Radiol Exp 4(1):63–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshida A, Kobayashi E, Kubo T, Kodaira M, Motoi T, Motoi N, Yonemori K, Ohe Y, Watanabe S-i, Kawai A, Kohno T, Kishimoto H, Ichikawa H, Hiraoka N (2017) Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas with comparison to potentially related entities. Mod Pathol 30(6):797–809.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.

Author information




TO, KY, TH, YI, and SK were responsible for the data acquisition. KY, JT, and TH contributed to this manuscript’s conception and design. YM and UT supervised. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TO and KY, and all authors commented and edited on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kota Yokoyama.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the local ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Images were acquired with clinical indication; patient consent for this retrospective study is waived.

Consent for publication

Written consent was obtained from individual participant included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okazaki, T., Yokoyama, K., Tsuchiya, J. et al. SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor detected by [18F]FDG PET/CT. European J Hybrid Imaging 5, 8 (2021).

Download citation


  • [18F]FDG
  • PET/CT
  • SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor