Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Short communication
  • Open Access

Somatostatin receptor based hybrid imaging in sarcoidosis

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 5,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 5
European Journal of Hybrid ImagingEJNMMI Multimodality Journal20171:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-017-0014-y

  • Received: 12 June 2017
  • Accepted: 18 September 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Several diagnostic imaging methodologies are available for the clinical evaluation of sarcoidosis, but all have their limitations. FDG PET/CT is frequently used, but this technique does not provide optimal results in all cases. Novel radiopharmaceuticals aimed at other disease targets may be helpful, particularly in cardiac sarcoidosis when FDG PET/CT has a low diagnostic accuracy, due to difficulties in preparing the patients who should use a specific diet combined with prolonged fasting. 68Ga-labeled somatostatin based receptor hybrid imaging is a potential alternative to FDG PET/CT.

This short communication provides a rapid overview of initial findings concerning the application of 68Ga-labeled somatostatin based receptor hybrid imaging in the diagnosis of (cardiac) sarcoidosis activity.

Keywords

  • Sarcoidosis
  • Cardiac
  • PET/CT
  • Somatostatin receptor imaging

Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology and is most commonly affecting lymph nodes in the mediastinum, hili and the parenchyma of the lungs, but it can involve any organ system (Baughman et al., 2001). Sarcoidosis affects approximately 10 out of 100,000 persons each year (Ungprasert et al., 2016). Cardiac sarcoidosis is reported to involve only 2% to 5% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis (Baughman et al., 2001; Lynch et al., 2014), but autopsy studies indicate a considerably higher prevalence of around 27% (Perry & Vuitch, 1995; Silverman et al., 1978).

The clinical presentation of cardiac sarcoidosis covers a large variability in arrhythmogenicity. This ranges from being asymptomatic to heart block, heart failure, complex arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) has published an expert consensus statement which recommends that patients with sarcoidosis proved by biopsy and possible clinical cardiac manifestations should be screened for cardiac involvement (Birnie et al., 2014). Non-invasive, specific imaging is needed to evaluate the cardiac sarcoid involvement.

Imaging

Several diagnostic imaging techniques for diagnosing sarcoidosis are available. Chest imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and monitoring of sarcoidosis. Chest X-ray is usually the initial approach to evaluate the parenchymal and mediastinal and hilar lymph node involvement. High-resolution CT (HRCT) is more accurate in visualizing the various manifestations of pulmonary sarcoidosis, including its complications, but lacks specificity for mediastinal lymph node involvement. 18F–fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, combined with computed tomography (CT) (FDG PET/CT) is emerging as a useful adjunct in complicated cases of sarcoidosis, particularly for identifying occult (extra)thoracic disease activity, including targets for tissue diagnosis, and has also been used as a non-invasive marker of disease severity especially in Stage IV pulmonary fibrosis, therapy evaluation, and in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). FDG PET/CT has been reported to display variable sensitivity and specificity for detecting CS, due to the absence of a specific diet and of prolonged fasting in some studies.(Youssef et al., 2012). Focal heterogeneous FDG uptake in the myocardium within the appropriate clinical context indicates cardiac involvement. The clinical application of FDG PET/CT to evaluate CS has several limitations. Myocardial FDG uptake can be highly variable and special preparation is required to suppress the glucose metabolism of the myocardial cells in order to eliminate physiological background myocardial FDG uptake as much as possible. Further pre-test optimization strategies are required, such as dietary modification or unfractionated heparin, as solely fasting may not be sufficient to suppress myocardial FDG uptake (Harisankar et al., 2011; Scholtens et al., 2016; Williams & Kolodny, 2008). FDG PET/CT may also show focal and heterogeneous uptake in the heart due to infarction or ischemia rather than CS, but in general, coronary artery disease is ruled out before by conventional diagnostics.

Specific radiopharmaceuticals without physiological myocardial background activity may be of additional value. 68Ga-labeled somatostatin based PET imaging is already available and used for other (oncological) applications, but may be promising to be applied in the diagnosis of (cardiac) sarcoidosis.

The somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) is highly expressed in sarcoid granulomas. This high SSTR2 receptor expression is beneficial for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) using 111In-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide (Kamphuis et al., 2015). 111In-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide and several 68Gallium-labeled somatostatin analogues which are used for PET imaging possess a high SSTR2 affinity (Gormsen et al., 2016). 68Ga-DOTA-NaI-octreotide (DOTANOC), 68Ga-DOTA-DPhe(Baughman et al., 2001)-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) or 68Ga-DOTA-D-Phe-Tyr-octreotide (DOTATOC) could be used as alternatives to the non-specific tracer FDG in patients with suspected (cardiac) sarcoidosis. Epithelioid cells, giant cells, and macrophages that can be found in sarcoid granulomas highly express SSTRs (more specifically, SSTR2A) on their surface (ten Bokum et al., 1999). These somatostatin analogs have different affinities to the different subtypes of the SSTR receptor. 68Ga-DOTANOC has a high affinity to both SSTR2 and 5 (Prasad & Baum, 2010), whereas 68Ga-DOTATOC has mainly high affinity to SSTR2 (Nobashi et al., 2016). The main advantage of these tracers is the absence of uptake in the normal heart, due to the lack of SSTR2 expression on the myocardial cell. The resulting high signal-to-noise ratio is beneficial for 68Ga- SSTR2 imaging, allowing a more straightforward and reproducible image interpretation, even by less experienced readers/physicians as compared to FDG imaging. 68Ga- SSTR2 imaging also provides data on SSTR2 expression by all lesions of the individual patient (whole body composition), which can help in assessing whether treatment with cold or hot somatostatin analogs could be beneficial. Finally, the benefit of generator produced 68Ga isotopes bypasses the dependency of a cyclotron.

Future

The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) has issued criteria for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. However, these criteria do not mention SSTR2 PET imaging, and also exclude the use of FDG PET/CT in CS (Jpn Ministry Health Welfare, 2007). The HRS recommends FDG PET/CT as diagnostic in CS, but is not mentioning SSTR2 imaging. A low number of mainly small studies has reported on the use of SSTR2 PET/CT imaging in CS (Gormsen et al., 2016; Nobashi et al., 2016; Lapa et al., 2016). Larger, randomized prospective studies should confirm the value of SSTR2 PET/CT imaging, compared to conventional imaging such as cardiac FDG PET and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

More recent studies have highlighted the utility of integrated FDG PET/MRI in CS (Hanneman et al., 2017; Schneider et al., 2014; Wada et al., 2015). In general, the detection of pathologic glucose metabolism using FDG-PET could improve the specificity of CMR. Late gadolinium enhancement can be measured semi-quantitatively using contour tracing, and more specifically, T2 mapping can be performed to measure disease activity (edema) which can be used in therapy monitoring (Yang et al., 2014). T1 mapping (tissue characterization) can also quantify the amount of fibrosis and inflammation (edema) in CS (Puntmann et al., 2017). Combined FDG and CMR imaging with hybrid PET/MRI may be of value.

But does the same hold true for combined SSTR2 PET/MRI imaging? Future studies will be necessary to provide evidence for the clinical application of PET/MRI in CS (Nensa et al., 2015).

At the moment, it is unclear whether SSTR2 PET/CT imaging is more beneficial in acute or chronic sarcoidosis. The initial impression is that SSTR2 PET/CT imaging is most helpful in the acute phase of sarcoidosis. In the chronic phase, fibrotic tissue is formed. Fibrotic tissue lacks substantial SSTR2 expression, potentially resulting in a low signal in SSTR2 PET/CT (Nobashi et al., 2016). It’s questionable if SSTR2 PET/CT imaging will then be better as compared to FDG. FDG activity and SSTR expression are different in these phases. The most optimal approach is using FDG for acute inflammation at first diagnosis of CS or suspicion of recurrence or relapse, because of the impact on the therapeutic management. The chronic phase should be covered by the CMR. An example of this is shown in Fig. 1, of a patient familiar with general sarcoidosis, including cardiac involvement. PET/CT visualized high FDG uptake and moderate 68Ga-SSTR2 uptake. Further investigations are needed to assess in which phase of sarcoidosis SSTR2 PET/CT imaging should be applied.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

68Ga-Dotatoc whole body PET (a) in a 56-year old woman with chronic (cardiac) sarcoidosis. Increased uptake is visible in the lymph nodes located at the right-sideof the mediastinum and in lung hilar tissue. 68Ga-Dotatoc PET/CT uptake (b) is visible in the left ventricle of the heart (lateral, basal, septal) and the anterior part of the right ventricle. The same distribution pattern is visible on FDG whole body (c) and cardiac PET (d), but is more intense. Apparently FDG PET was more helpful than 68Ga-Dotatoc in the chronic phase of sarcoidosis in this patient

Applying this 68Ga-SSTR2 in the chronic phase (relapse/recurrence) of (cardiac) sarcoidosis seems to be a potential role, maybe combined with CMR, using hybrid PET/MRI. Another option is application in patients that are unable/not willing to prepare for a FDG PET/CT scan by subjecting themselves to a low-carbohydrate/high fat diet and fasting regime.

Further, the expression of SSTR2 in sarcoid tissue can be used in the theranostic approach. High SSTR2 receptor expression suggests that somatostatin treatment may be an option in patients that are resistant to conventional treatment with corticosteroids. In these patients 68Ga-SSTR2 imaging might be helpful to evaluate and to quantify the SSTR2 expression and may predict the effect of treatment with somatostatin.

In conclusion, 68Ga labeled SSTR2 PET/CT seems an interesting alternative to FDG PET/CT in (cardiac) sarcoidosis, since these modalities have different imaging targets. Additional studies comparing these radiopharmaceuticals are needed, particularly to evaluate in which phase of sarcoidosis (acute or chronic) 68Ga labeled SSTR2 PET/CT will be more beneficial than FDG.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Aren van Waarde for editing English spellings.

Funding

No funding was supplied for this study.

Authors’ contributions

RS designed, wrote, edited and reviewed the manuscript. KP Koopmans wrote, edited and reviewed the manuscript. PPVG edited and reviewed the manuscript. HK reviewed the manuscript. HJMG reviewed the manuscript. CTG reviewed the manuscript. NHJP wrote, edited and reviewed the manuscript. AWJMG designed, wrote, edited and reviewed the manuscript. GDN designed edited and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was not required (since this is a retrospective study).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical Imaging Center (MIC), Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging and Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
(2)
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
(3)
Department of Cardiology, Groningen, The Netherlands
(4)
Department of Pulmonology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
(5)
Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

References

  1. Baughman RP, Teirstein AS, Judson MA, Rossman MD, Yeager H Jr, Bresnitz EA et al (2001) Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:1885–1889View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F, Cooper JM, Culver DA, Duvernoy CS et al (2014) HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm 11:1305–1323View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gormsen LC, Haraldsen A, Kramer S, Dias AH, Kim WY, Borghammer P (2016) A dual tracer (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT pilot study for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis. EJNMMI Res 6:52View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanneman K, Kadoch M, Guo HH, Jamali M, Quon A, Iagaru A et al. Initial Experience With Simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Myocarditis. Clin Nucl Med 2017;42(7):e328–e334Google Scholar
  5. Harisankar CN, Mittal BR, Agrawal KL, Abrar ML, Bhattacharya A (2011) Utility of high fat and low carbohydrate diet in suppressing myocardial FDG uptake. J Nucl Cardiol 18:926–936View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jpn Ministry Health Welfare (2007) Diagnostic standard and guidelines for sarcoidosis. Jpn J Sarcoidosis and Granulomatuous Disorders (Japanese) 27:89–102Google Scholar
  7. Kamphuis LS, Kwekkeboom DJ, Missotten TO, Baarsma GS, Dalm VA, Dik WA et al (2015) Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy patterns in patients with sarcoidosis. Clin Nucl Med 40:925–929View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lapa C, Reiter T, Kircher M, Schirbel A, Werner RA, Pelzer T et al (2016) Somatostatin receptor based PET/CT in patients with the suspicion of cardiac sarcoidosis: an initial comparison to cardiac MRI. Oncotarget 7:77807–77814PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Lynch JP III, Hwang J, Bradfield J, Fishbein M, Shivkumar K, Tung R (2014) Cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis: evolving concepts in diagnosis and treatment. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 35:372–390View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Nensa F, Tezgah E, Poeppel T, Nassenstein K, Schlosser T (2015) Diagnosis and treatment response evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis using positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 36:550View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nobashi T, Nakamoto Y, Kubo T, Ishimori T, Handa T, Tanizawa K et al (2016) The utility of PET/CT with (68)Ga-DOTATOC in sarcoidosis: comparison with (67)Ga-scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med 30:544–552View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Perry A, Vuitch F (1995) Causes of death in patients with sarcoidosis. A morphologic study of 38 autopsies with clinicopathologic correlations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 119:167–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Prasad V, Baum RP (2010) Biodistribution of the Ga-68 labeled somatostatin analogue DOTA-NOC in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: characterization of uptake in normal organs and tumor lesions. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 54:61–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Puntmann VO, Isted A, Hinojar R, Foote L, Carr-White G, Nagel E. T1 and T2 Mapping in Recognition of Early Cardiac Involvement in Systemic Sarcoidosis. Radiology 2017;285(1):63–72.Google Scholar
  15. Schneider S, Batrice A, Rischpler C, Eiber M, Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG (2014) Utility of multimodal cardiac imaging with PET/MRI in cardiac sarcoidosis: implications for diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. Eur Heart J 35:312View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Scholtens AM, Verberne HJ, Budde RP, Lam MG (2016) Additional Heparin Preadministration Improves Cardiac Glucose Metabolism Suppression over Low-Carbohydrate Diet Alone in (1)(8)F-FDG PET Imaging. J Nucl Med 57:568–573View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Silverman KJ, Hutchins GM, Bulkley BH (1978) Cardiac sarcoid: a clinicopathologic study of 84 unselected patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Circulation 58:1204–1211View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. ten Bokum AM, Hofland LJ, de JG BJ, Melief MJ, Kwekkeboom DJ et al (1999) Immunohistochemical localization of somatostatin receptor sst2A in sarcoid granulomas. Eur J Clin Investig 29:630–636View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ungprasert P, Carmona EM, Utz JP, Ryu JH, Crowson CS, Matteson EL (2016) Epidemiology of Sarcoidosis 1946-2013: A Population-Based Study. Mayo Clin Proc 91:183–188View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wada K, Niitsuma T, Yamaki T, Masuda A, Ito H, Kubo H et al. Simultaneous cardiac imaging to detect inflammation and scar tissue with F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI in cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Cardiol 2015;23(5):1180–1182.Google Scholar
  21. Williams G, Kolodny GM (2008) Suppression of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake by preparing patients with a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W151–W156View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang Y, Safka K, Graham JJ, Roifman I, Zia MI, Wright GA et al (2014) Correlation of late gadolinium enhancement MRI and quantitative T2 measurement in cardiac sarcoidosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:609–616View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Youssef G, Leung E, Mylonas I, Nery P, Williams K, Wisenberg G et al (2012) The use of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis including the Ontario experience. J Nucl Med 53:241–248View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement